@1733200027895679_340562
A debate emerged between two organizations over an agreement. One party asserted the terms were uncertain, prompting errors about conveyance cutoff times and installment conditions. The other party contended that the agreement was clear and that the deferrals were because of the principal party's inability to meet their commitments. The two sides looked for legitimate goal, with each side introducing proof to help their cases. The result relied upon deciphering the agreement's language and deciding liability regarding the postponements.